After proceeding to the accumulation of sentences of the author of a continuous crime of robbery in an inhabited house, he presents an appeal for cassation. He understands that his right to effective judicial protection has been violated, in addition to the violation of the articles of the Criminal Procedure Law that determine that each crime gives rise to the formation of a single case and when related crimes occur or not ( article 17) and the permission it gives to the convicted person to file an appeal for violation of the law (article 988).
Initially the result is compliance with a prison
Phone Number Data sentence of 12 years and 18 months while the appellant understands that the sentence to be served must be between 2 and 6 years in prison after the accumulation of the crimes.
The Chamber recalls the provisions of article 76 of the Penal Code: » the maximum effective fulfillment of the guilty party's sentence may not exceed three times the time for which the most serious of the penalties incurred are imposed, declaring them extinguished. those that come from when those already imposed cover said maximum, which may not exceed 20 years.
The Supreme Court understands that any reason that seeks to modify the content of an executive order, as is the case in this case, is not included in article 988 LECrim, and the appeal presented is dismissed.
Zaloguj
Zarejestruj
FAQ
Szukaj
